By Pat L Johnson -
There is a trend among police departments across the U.S. to force DUI suspects to have their blood alcohol content (BAC) measured. Since BAC evidence is generally the most powerful evidence to support a DUI conviction, many jurisdictions are going the extra mile to get it.
During “No Refusal” campaigns, drivers who are suspected of DUI are given an ultimatum. They may submit to a breath test to measure their blood alcohol content, or they will be forced to give a blood sample for testing. After a motorist is given the choice and still refuses to take a breath test, a warrant to obtain a blood sample is immediately obtained. Judges are on standby to sign the blood draw warrants.
In some jurisdictions that allow forced blood draws on DUI suspects, the officers do the blood draws themselves, rather than taking suspects to the hospital for blood draws by trained medical professionals. Although there has been at least one lawsuit filed because of this practice, it has become more common to allow officers without adequate medical training to draw blood from DUI suspects.
Scripps News reported an Arizona man filed a lawsuit after allegedly developing a persistent infection at the site of a blood draw performed by a Pima County sheriff’s deputy. Under Arizona DUI laws, suspects must submit to blood alcohol content testing or lose their driver’s license for one year. The officer makes the choice whether to take a breath or blood sample and the driver has no choice.
As DUI lawyers can more easily challenge breath test results, law enforcement departments have become more aggressive with no refusal events and policies. Blood alcohol testing done with a blood sample is far more reliable and not as easily refuted in court.
However, when the arresting officers take forced blood samples at the roadside, there is a greater risk to the health of DUI [http://www.totaldui.com/overview/default.aspx] suspects. As no refusal policies become more common, more personal injury lawsuits are likely. Regardless of the disposition of a DUI case, if a suspect is injured or becomes ill due to a forced blood draw; taxpayers may wind up footing the bill for medical expenses and punitive damages.
I believe in protecting people’s rights. This includes the rights of anyone accused of a crime, even DUI [http://www.totaldui.com] and DWI. The DUI laws in every state are complex and nuanced. Knowing your rights and the laws will help you make better decisions – decisions that could have a big impact on the rest of your life.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Pat_L_Johnson
http://EzineArticles.com/?The-Facts-About-Forced-Blood-Tests-During-a-DUI-Stop&id=2071633